Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs Galaxy A35 5G: Main differences

2comments
Galaxy A36 and Galaxy A35 side by side

Intro


Samsung has just announced a new mid-range phone, the Galaxy A36, which will take the relay from the older Galaxy A35 and carry the mid-range effort through 2025. Or, you know, at least until the Galaxy A56 arrives in the US. 

With the Galaxy A36, Samsung is taking baby steps and not upgrading too many aspects of the device. That's why Galaxy A35 users will probably find it challenging to justify upgrading. At least in our eyes, upgrading from the older model to the latest one doesn't make a lot of sense. 

Galaxy A36 vs Galaxy A35 differences:




Read more:

Design and Size

Change for the sake of change


The new Galaxy A36 5G scores a slightly thinner 7.4 mm body in comparison with the older Galaxy A35, which stood at 8.2 mm. While the general design language is the same, we now get Gorilla Glass Victus+ at the back of the Galaxy A36, whereas the A35 featured a plastic rear plate. Up front, both phones boast Gorilla Glass Victus+. 

The biggest design change, however, can be seen at the back, where Samsung has moved from the separate camera lens design on the Galaxy A35 and employs a unified camera island comprising all three camera lenses at the rear. 


Interestingly, this design stands out a bit from the rest of Samsung's phones. The Galaxy S25 series, for example, uses separate camera lenses, just like the Galaxy S24 range, and the Galaxy A series now look like the outliers.

Not a design change that might have been done with any particular reason in mind, but hey, it looks different enough for the sake of change itself.

The Key Island design element, which unifies the power and volume keys, is here to stay. IP67 dust and water resistance is common on both phones. 

Aside from that, there aren't any other major changes between the Galaxy A36 and the Galaxy A35. 


Display-wise, we get a slight screen size bump to 6.7 inches, up from 6.6 inches on the Galaxy A35. Both screens are OLED ones with FHD+ resolution and 120Hz refresh rate. Aside from the screen size, the big difference here is the peak brightness, which is significantly higher on the new model. Still, in terms of color accuracy and overall properties, the older device is still perfectly adequate. 

Display Measurements:



Biometrics-wise, both come with in-display fingerprint scanners of the optical type. Those are usually slower than the ultrasonic ones found on the company's pricier flagships, but still do a good job. Have in mind that they are not so forgiving if you misplace your fingerprint and might sometimes fail to deliver a correct reading. 

Performance and Software

Running in the same place

The Galaxy A36 uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, a 5nm chipset that will surely strike a good balance between speed and power-savings. Efficiency is key with mid-range devices, after all.  

This return to the Qualcomm fold will be another generational change after Samsung went from the MediaTek Dimensity 1080 with the Galaxy A34 to the Exynos 1380 with the Galaxy A35. It's now Qualcomm's turn once again in the driver's seat, though with some uncertainties involved.

In our initial tests, the Galaxy A36 and Galaxy A35 are on par in terms of CPU tasks, but the newer phone has the upper hand in terms of GPU performance. 

Performance Benchmarks:


Geekbench 6
SingleHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G1019
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G1027
Geekbench 6
MultiHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G2915
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G2937
3DMark Extreme(High)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G914
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G811
3DMark
Extreme(Low)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G909
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G807

Other than that, we get 8GB of RAM in the entry-level 128GB version, with 256GB of storage available as well. Unlike the Galaxy A35, we don't get a microSD card slot here. 

There is a microSD card slot on board the Galaxy A36.

In terms of software support, we will get six years of support for this new mid-ranger. We know Samsung has committed to seven years of software support for its more premium phones, but honestly, six years of support for a mid-range phone is quite decent!

Camera

Room for improvement


We get a 50MP main, an 8MP ultrawide, and finally, a 5MP macro is sadly completing the camera setup on the Galaxy A36. At the front, we have a 12MP camera. 

That's mostly the same camera setup as the Galaxy A35 had that 50MP main, 8MP ultrawide, a 5MP macro camera, and a 13MP front-facing camera, which does the job, but doesn't impress with anything in particular. 

PhoneArena Camera Score:


Photo
Video
Phone Camera
Score
Photo
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 120 126 68 17 23 18
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 130 138 76 21 25 16
Phone Camera
Score
Video
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 120 114 62 16 22 13
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 130 123 68 20 23 11
Find out more details about photo and video scores for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Camera Score page

Surprisingly, however, Samsung has altered the image processing with the Galaxy A36, resulting in different image processing. Sadly, as per our tests, the newer phone doesn't take better photos or videos than its predecessor; it's actually the other way around.

This is the result of some excessive oversharpening and overprocessing we're seeing, as well as a generally warmer color temperature that shifts away from the more natural look of Galaxy A35's camera.

Recommended Stories

Main Camera




While photos taken with the Galaxy A36 aren't inherently worse than the ones taken with the Galaxy A35, there's slightly more oversharpening and overprocessing in samples taken with the newer phone. The colors are a lot warmer, too, which isn't that bad, but doesn't look good when you compare it to the more realistic output of the Galaxy A35. 

Ultrawide camera



The most significant difference here is the color temperature between the two. Other than that, the two ultrawide cameras are very similar.

Zoom Quality




At 2X, we're relying on digital zoom already, and the quality is okay. The photos are perfectly usable for just about any purpose. 

More Galaxy 36 vs Galaxy A35 camera samples




Video Quality


Video Thumbnail

Video quality on the Galaxy A36 isn't particularly good. First up, the image processing is inconsistent here, with the video quality of the Galaxy A36 being colder than the Galaxy A35. 

Next, the dynamic range of the new phone is just atrocious: while with the Galaxy A35 you can still make out some features of the subject in extreme lighting conditions, with the A36 you're basically left with a silhouette of a man. 


Battery Life and Charging

With the Galaxy A36, you get slightly better battery life


The Galaxy A35 had a standard 5,000mAh battery, which is great, but the thinner Galaxy A36 also has a 5,000mAh battery on board, which is altogether great news! Samsung has shaved off a millimeter from the body without sacrificing the battery capacity, which is what we love to see. 

However, how does the new chipset on deck affect the battery life?

In our own custom battery tests, the Galaxy A36 pulls slightly ahead with a slightly better battery life than the Galaxy A35. The new phone takes a big lead in the browsing test, where it lasts two hours extra in our workflow that aims to simulate a regular browsing experience with the screen set at 200 nits. 

However, in our video streaming and 3D gaming tests, the older Galaxy stills performs slightly better. Overall, battery life shouldn't make a big role in your decision to upgrade to the newer Galaxy A36

PhoneArena Battery and Charging Test Results:


Battery Life
Charging
Phone Battery Life
estimate
Browsing Video Gaming
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
6h 26min 16h 53min 8h 0min 9h 8min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
6h 12min 14h 40min 8h 15min 9h 55min
Phone Full Charging 30 min Charge
Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
1h 15min N/A 55% N/A
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
1h 27min N/A 49% N/A
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page

Charging-wise, we've got a surprising upgrade to 45W of wired charging. Yes, that's right, even the flagship Galaxy S25 is equipped with less than that, making Samsung's recent mid-rangers pretty intriguing. The older Galaxy A35 boasts 25W charging, which is slower. 

This charging speed increase has resulted in a 15-minute faster charge on the new phone. Not that much, but still noteworthy. None of these two phones boasts wireless charging. 

Audio Quality


Equipped with stereo speakers, both phones deliver good audio for their price point. Bass is a bit lacking and the highs aren't very detailed, there's also some distortion when you push the volume too far. 

Specs Comparison


Here's how the Galaxy A36 5G vs Galaxy A35 5G specs compare:


Summary



The Galaxy A36 5G feels like one step forward and… one step backwards at the same time, making it stand in the same exact place.

While we've got a slightly better design and improved average battery life and charging speed, we have also got a slightly worse camera image processing, as well as the same general performance. 

This doesn't make the Galaxy A36 feel like a proper follow-up to the Galaxy A35, and if you have one of those, you probably shouldn't upgrade to the Galaxy A36

It's still a great-value mid-ranger, but don't only upgrade if you're coming from a much older Galaxy. 

Recommended Stories

Loading Comments...
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless