Apple iPhone 16 vs Samsung Galaxy S25: who deserves that $800 more?

0comments
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase from the links on this page.
Apple iPhone 16 vs Samsung Galaxy S25: who deserves that $800 more?
Video Thumbnail


Intro


Now that Samsung's flagship trio for 2025 is out, it's time to properly compare it to Apple's latest offerings. We are skipping the iPhone 16e for now — that's more of a Galaxy S24 FE competitor. What we are looking at here are the $800 "smallest flagships" in the lineups — the base level Galaxy S25 vs the base iPhone 16. No Pros and no Ultras allowed.

On the surface, it looks like Samsung is offering a bit more bang for your buck. The Galaxy S25 doesn't cut down on camera count (well, it kind of does, as the Ultra has 4 cameras but that's besides the point), and it doesn't cut down on display quality. Samsung is quite proud of its AMOLED panels and would like everyone to see them, thank you very much.

On the other end, the iPhone is the iPhone — it's a staple in the industry thanks to its predictably stable and solid user experience. Which one of these phones deserves your $800 more?

iPhone 16 vs Galaxy S25 differences explained:


Table of Contents:


Galaxy S25 Plus: Save up to $820 with trade-in!

$299 99
$1119 99
$820 off (73%)
Trade in your old phone to save up to $700 on the exciting Galaxy S25 Plus. Samsung also gives you a $120 instant discount on the 512GB variant, giving you a total of up to $820 off the high-class Galaxy AI phone.
Buy at Samsung

Galaxy S25: Save up to $500 with a trade-in!

$299 99
$799 99
$500 off (63%)
Trade in your old phone to save up to $500 on the Galaxy S25. The 256GB variant is also available at the same $500 maximum trade-in discount.
Buy at Samsung

Get the iPhone 16 for up to $630 off with trade-ins

$169
$799
$630 off (79%)
Get the iPhone 16 to experience Apple Intelligence and save up to $630 with eligible trade-ins. The promotion is available at the official Apple Store.
Buy at Apple

Get iPhone 16 Plus at Apple.com for up to $630 off

$269
$899
$630 off (70%)
Enjoy Apple Intelligence on a larger screen with the iPhone 16 Plus. This bad boy is available for up to $630 off with eligible trade-ins at the official store.
Buy at Apple

Design and Display Quality

These are pretty


The Galaxy S25 and iPhone 16 are very much direct competitors, and this is immediately evident when you hold them in hand. They are mostly the same in shape, size, and weight, virtually interchangeable when it comes to compactness and comfort.

The iPhone 16 does have a bunch more buttons to play with. The Action Button has now fully replaced the Mute toggle of yore, and you can program it to launch any of your favorite apps, or actions within some apps. It also has the new Camera Control button, which is technologically impressive but with dubious usability.

If you haven't been following — the Camera Control button has a capacitive top, so you can control camera features by swiping across it. A half-press causes the phone to focus in and lock exposure, a full press takes a photo. But most people still prefer just using the tap controls in the camera app.


The Galaxy S25 has no extra buttons, just the power key and volume rocker. It feels as solid as the iPhone.

Both phones have aluminum frames and glass backs with a frosted matte finish. And both have that all-screen front, but the Galaxy S25 has the thinner bezels here so it looks a bit more refined.

We are dealing with premium builds and protection from the elements — both the Galaxy S25 and iPhone 16 are IP68 rated.



Both of these phones offer OLED panels, Samsung's is branded Dynamic AMOLED 2x. That refers to its dynamic refresh rate and ability to go from 1 Hz to 120 Hz, plus its HDR compatibility thanks to its 2,600 nit peak brightness.

The iPhone 16's panel has a standard 60 Hz refresh rate, but it's also HDR-compliant with 2,000 nits peak. You will also notice that the iPhone has a bigger cutout in the screen for the Face ID sensor array. That's the Apple Dynamic Island, as Apple uses that blacked-out area to hang widgets around it and pretend it's all a part of the design and software being married.

In general, both of these screens can look lovely and have multiple comfort modes for blue light filtering and color temperature adjustment, based on your current ambient lighting. The higher refresh rate of the Samsung does look more pleasing. Eventhough the iOS software is super-smooth, moving back to 60 Hz definitely takes a bit of adjustment once your eyes are "spoiled".

Display Measurements:




While peak brightness can give you some impressive numbers, we do measure 20% APL brightness to get a clearer idea of how displays perform during "normal" everyday use. Both the Galaxy S25 and iPhone 16 scored north of 2,000 nits, which is excellent for daytime viewing. And both scored a sub-nit measuring at minimum brightness, so they are great bedside companions as well.

For biometrics, the Galaxy uses an under-screen ultrasonic fingerprint scanner. It's fast and dependable, and has its fair share of fans. Apple's Face ID however, is excellent — it's quite convenient to be able to (securely) unlock your phone by just looking at it, and is something that "spoils" you after a few months of use. Going back to fingerprint scans after that is an adjustment.

Performance and Software

Beasts battling it out



Samsung's partnership with Qualcomm continues to bear fruit, as we keep getting these slightly-overclocked Snapdragons in Samsung phones. The Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy can hit a top speed of 4.47 GHz, and is being backed up by thermal management that is mostly adequate. The iPhone has the new Apple A18, developed to run Apple Intelligence with no trouble and supposedly as powerful as the top-tier Apple A18 Pro (minus the GPU). So, let's take a look at some numbers:

Recommended Stories

Performance Benchmarks:


Geekbench 6
SingleHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy S253031
Apple iPhone 163264
Geekbench 6
MultiHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy S259626
Apple iPhone 167899
3DMark Extreme(High)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S255959
Apple iPhone 164029
3DMark
Extreme(Low)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S252500
Apple iPhone 162397


And yep, the Snapdragon 8 Elite is definitely bringing the big guns. While it only lags behind in Single Core CPU scores, it makes up for it in every other category. Even when throttling, it is slightly faster than the Apple A18. Great job!

But those are just numbers, how is it all in real life? We feel both of these phones are snappy, responsive, and fun. The Galaxy S25 does have a leg up thanks to its 120 Hz screen and super-smooth animations. But we wouldn't say the iPhone 16 "lags" or anything. It is still a latest-gen iPhone and runs as such.

For storage, both of these phones have the 128 GB base option. If buying the Galaxy, we strongly suggest going for the 256 GB storage option. That's because the 128 GB has a UFS 3.1 chip, while the upgrade gives you UFS 4.0 with double the read and write speeds. The good news is that during various sales periods, and even during the launch time for the S25 series, Samsung often runs a "free storage upgrade on us" promo.

For software, we have Samsung's One UI 7 on top of Android 15 versus Apple's latest iOS 18. And lots and lots of AI features.

OK the Apple text tools are not fantastic and the Clean Up tool can be a hit and miss. The same can be said about Samsung's Magic Eraser. The new furball of AI features that manufacturers has hurled at us recently is still... mostly a party trick. For example, the Galaxy has the Live Translate for phone calls. But it's so slow and inaccurate that you will probably avoid it. Still, an argument can be made "Well, it's there for when you may need it and have no other option".

Unfortunately, the same argument doesn't hold water when you use it for the Apple Image Playground. 

Both phones offer the text summary option, which we find to be the most useful to date. So, when ignoring AI, what else does the software offer?

Both One UI and iOS are quite mature nowadays. You won't be wanting or missing features with either one, especially considering that both manufacturers like to "borrow" what works from the competition. And for software updates — Samsung promises you 7 years worth of Android builds, and the iPhone will get a minimum of 5 iOS updates, based on historical evidence. So... you're covered.

Camera

Do three cameras make a difference?


When you look at the Galaxy S25's back, it appears to give you the full package. A full trio of cameras — 50 MP main, 12 MP ultra-wide, 10 MP 3x telephoto. The iPhone 16 feels like it has been cut down to size, with a 48 MP main and 12 MP ultra-wide camera.

However, running them through our comprehensive test, we find that the iPhone is ever-so-slightly better at photography. It's only in the zoom department where it falls behind and that's by only a couple of points.

PhoneArena Camera Score:


Photo
Video
Phone Camera
Score
Photo
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 16 149 154 82 24 28 21
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 151 80 21 27 23
Phone Camera
Score
Video
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 16 149 143 76 22 26 18
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 142 74 21 26 21
Find out more details about photo and video scores for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Camera Score page


That 3x telephoto lens on the Galaxy S25 does allow it to go all the way up to 30x maximum zoom. But, for "regular" scenarios where you only need to zoom in a bit or take a portrait photo at 2x — the iPhone is doing more than adequate. In general, these cameras are very comparable in performance, as can be seen from the results above. Now, for the actual examples below:

Main Camera




Samsung photos continue to lean into slightly more exposure, a bit more boosted shadows, while iPhone photos are more confidently contrast-y. Color reproduction on both sides is very, very similar. Where there is a difference, the iPhone will lean a bit more into a warm yellow-ish hue, where the Galaxy S25 typically is a bit cooler with a slight magenta cast.

For fine details, you've probably heard by now, this years Galaxy S25 series does not oversharpen as much as before, and its details are a bit softer, a bit more realistic. The iPhone feels a bit less confident, as it clearly sharpens up tiny detail.



A night photo makes the aforementioned differences much clearer, with the iPhone 16's yellow cast and oversharpening becoming much more evident. In general, the darker Galaxy S25 shot here appears more realistic simply because — yes, it was night time!

Zoom Quality




The iPhone 16 taps out at 10x zoom for photos, whereas the Galaxy S25 can keep going until 30x. And, at 10x, you can see the iPhone is clearly reaching its limits. Details are hazy and the photo is starting to look like an oil painting. A good time to stop zooming!

The Galaxy S25 itself starts showing such artifacts at 30x zoom. In general, it's the better zoom phone thanks to its dedicated 3rd camera:



Ultra-wide Camera



The ultra-wide cameras are tuned to match their main camera counterparts. Samsung's ultra-wide seems to be a bit better at handling high dynamics. But night photos actually come out better with the iPhone's ultra-wide:



With clearer details, less haze, and more accurate colors, the iPhone's ultra-wide holds it together better at night.

Selfies




A similar treatment of dynamics and colors can be observed with the selfie camera. The Galaxy has less contrast and brighter blacks, where the iPhone is more contrast-y and slightly yellow-ish. For details, the Samsung selfie camera does the oversharpening that the main camera left in the past. On the other hand, the iPhone selfie looks maybe a bit too soft.

More Camera Samples




Battery Life and Charging

Compact but lasting



The Galaxy S25 comes with a nice rounded number of 4,000 mAh in its tank. That's quite a bit of battery — not entirely the 5,000 mAh which is the norm for an Android flagship, but considering that the Galaxy S25 is relatively "compact" in size, 4,000 mAh is a good-sized backpack. That goes against Apple's 3,561 mAh cell and here's how they do with endurance:

PhoneArena Battery and Charging Test Results:


Battery Life
Charging
Phone Battery Life
estimate
Browsing Video Gaming
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
7h 6min 18h 29min 8h 1min 12h 20min
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
6h 21min 16h 48min 7h 30min 9h 52min
Phone Full Charging 30 min Charge
Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
1h 22min Untested 54% Untested
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
1h 42min 1h 43min 59% 50%
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page


So, the Galaxy is able to give us some more screen-on time. Depending on what you are doing, that can be between 30 minutes and 120 minutes of extra use. It's worth noting that iOS is quite capable of retaining battery percentages when the phone is in standby — much better than Android. So, generally speaking, with regular casual use, both of these phones give us similar battery endurance. That's about a day plus change, if you forget to charge overnight.

Audio Quality and Haptics


Both phones have the stereo speakers in bottom boomer / earpiece combo variant. And both sound pretty good, but the iPhone is just a pinch better with deeper bass and more pleasingly carved mids. The Galaxy S25 has more details in the mids but is a little more honky and a bit thinner-sounding. Small differences, in general, both of these phones serve well for binging YouTube videos, for example.

For haptics, both are very clicky and responsive. The Samsung vibration may be a bit weak when it comes to "feeling" muted phonecalls. Other than that, both vibration motors feel great.

Specs Comparison


We have a full page set up for the Galaxy S25 vs iPhone 16 specs, but here are the highlights:


Which one should you buy?



In general, both of these are pretty excellent phones and are very much comparable. From their size and feel, to their performance, to the screens and battery endurance. The Galaxy S25 does give you a little bit more for your money. That extra camera can become handy in certain situations, in general you do get more screen-on time, and its chip can score better on benchmarks. The real big difference here is the 120 Hz display, which we feel is a must on a 2025 flagship.

Of course, if you have your toes dipped into the Apple ecosystem, with a pair of AirPods or with an Apple Watch on your wishlist, then the iPhone 16 may make more sense. In that case — go for it, it's still a solid phone. Platform-agnostic? The scale is tipped slightly to the Galaxy S25 side.



Create a free account and join our vibrant community
Register to enjoy the full PhoneArena experience. Here’s what you get with your PhoneArena account:
  • Access members-only articles
  • Join community discussions
  • Share your own device reviews
  • Build your personal phone library
Register For Free

Recommended Stories

Loading Comments...
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless