Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) Review

20comments


Update: You can now read our Galaxy A3 (2017) review!

Introduction


Being obsessed top tech brands’ flagship devices, we sometimes forget that not all people need a phone with a gigantic screen, the fastest processor, or the latest camera technologies. In reality, there are still folks who look for a simpler phone – one that just works, one that fits in any pocket, one that doesn’t cost a small fortune to own. The Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) aims to be one such phone, but how well does it match the description? Well, I used it for a week to find out!

In the box:

  • Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)
  • Wall charger (5V, 1.55A)
  • Micro USB cable
  • SIM card ejector
  • Wired stereo in-ear headset (Model EHS64AVFWE)
  • Quick start guide and warranty information

Design

The new Galaxy A3 is very attractive, pleasant to use, and its size makes it ideal for single-handed operation.

When I took the 2016-edition Samsung Galaxy A3 out of its box, I checked again to make sure I had received the right smartphone. I was expecting it to be a humble low-tier device, but it didn’t look like one. Pleasantly surprised, I found myself holding a phone akin to the company’s top-tier models – one built of glass, held together by a sturdy metal frame, with rounded corners and chamfered edges for a comfortable, reassuring feel when held. The easy-to-reach volume, power, and home buttons are great as well, responding with a satisfying click when pressed. And with a screen size of 4.7-inches, the new Galaxy A3 can be easily operated with a single hand – a trait fewer and fewer phones can brag with.

Alas, the appealing design of the 2016-edition Galaxy A3 has its downsides. The handset’s flat, smooth glass body gives it the tendency to slip off of flat surfaces even at the slightest angle. And that’s actually a big deal – I’m not convinced that the phone’s otherwise beautiful glass front and back plates would withstand more than a few drops from a table’s edge.


Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)
Dimensions

5.3 x 2.57 x 0.29 inches

134.5 x 65.2 x 7.3 mm

Weight

4.66 oz (132 g)

Apple iPhone SE
Dimensions

4.87 x 2.31 x 0.3 inches

123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm

Weight

3.99 oz (113 g)

Motorola Moto G (2015)
Dimensions

5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches

142 x 72.4 x 12.2 mm

Weight

5.47 oz (155 g)

OnePlus X
Dimensions

5.51 x 2.72 x 0.27 inches

140 x 69 x 6.9 mm

Weight

4.87 oz (138 g)

Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)
Dimensions

5.3 x 2.57 x 0.29 inches

134.5 x 65.2 x 7.3 mm

Weight

4.66 oz (132 g)

Apple iPhone SE
Dimensions

4.87 x 2.31 x 0.3 inches

123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm

Weight

3.99 oz (113 g)

Motorola Moto G (2015)
Dimensions

5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches

142 x 72.4 x 12.2 mm

Weight

5.47 oz (155 g)

OnePlus X
Dimensions

5.51 x 2.72 x 0.27 inches

140 x 69 x 6.9 mm

Weight

4.87 oz (138 g)

Compare these and other phones using our Size Comparison tool.


Display

Sufficiently detailed and bright, the Galaxy A3’s Super AMOLED screen gets the job done. Color accuracy in Basic Mode is great overall.


It doesn’t take a trained eye to notice that the Galaxy A3’s 4.7-inch display is special. Built on Super AMOLED technology, it draws attention from afar with its intense, saturated to the point of exaggeration colors. I’m guessing that many people would actually find this kind of color reproduction quite appealing, yet folks who value color accuracy (such as myself) have the freedom of switching from Adaptive Mode, which set as default, to Basic Mode. The latter option, found in the Display Settings menu, produces almost ideally faithful colors across the entire spectrum, as our measurements confirm.

Colors aside, the phone’s screen delivers 720 by 1280 pixels of resolution (312 pixels per inch), meaning that graphics and text are sharp enough. I’ve seen much more detailed screens on phones of this tier, but even on the new Galaxy A3, I’ve almost never found image detail to be insufficient or text to be difficult to read.

Before I proceed, I must say that the Galaxy A3 (2016) is perfectly usable outdoors. Its screen not only has a high brightness output of nearly 500 nits, but it also has an outdoor display mode that kicks in automatically and boosts readability even further. At night, the screen brightness goes down to 1 nit so it is easy on the eyes.



Interface and functionality

Samsung’s own custom interface is a familiar affair. For the most part, the A3 behaves as other recent Galaxies.

We have Android 5.1 Lollipop running on the Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016), which is a shame now that 6.0 Marshmallow has been out for half a year. There’s no word on when (or whether) the phone will be updated to a newer version of the OS.

That aside, on top of Lollipop we see Samsung’s own custom user interface. The software is very similar to what you’d find on most other recent Samsung devices, meaning that quite a few extras have been thrown in. For instance, double-pressing the home button launches the camera from any screen, and that’s a very handy shortcut. There’s also Samsung’s own Ultra Power Saving Mode, KNOX support for users needing corporate-grade security, and a variety of options for personalizing the UI

But at the same time, Samsung’s software has its annoyances. The Flipboard-powered news reader, for example, is ridiculously laggy to open, which is why I chose to turn it off. Also, even though I was happy to see support for UI themes, very few of the ones I tried were actually good.

Typing on Samsung’s on-screen keyboard was a bit frustrating at first. Eventually, my fingers got familiar with the keys’ tight layout, but typos were still more common than I was willing to tolerate. I did find an option to increase the keyboard size, which improved my typing accuracy, but it also ate up some screen space. Also, I found the keyboard to be glitchy in landscape mode with Facebook Messenger.

System performance

Satisfactory for a phone of this class, although occasional lags are present.


This paragraph took me longer to write than it should have, as I got carried away playing Crossy Road. Indeed, the Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) is suitable for gaming, and it will even run more demanding games like Asphalt Nitro, GT Racing 2, or Mortal Kombat X. The 1.5GHz quad-core Exynos SoC and its Mali-T720 GPU are render even these last three at playable framerates.

During every-day use, the UI stays mostly smooth and responsive. However, occasional lags and slowdowns are present, even annoying at times. The new Galaxy A3 might need a few extra seconds to launch apps or to switch between them, which might have something to do with the amount of RAM available – for a contemporary Android phone, 1.5GB is a modest figure.

Out of the 16GB of storage built in, about 11GB are available to the user, and that’s going to run out quickly if you’re into games or taking photos. Thankfully, storage expansion via microSD cards is an option.


AnTuTuHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)36116.66
Apple iPhone SE117207.66
Motorola Moto G(2015)22406
OnePlus X40173
Vellamo MetalHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)1043.33
Motorola Moto G(2015)1224
OnePlus X1542
Vellamo BrowserHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)2793
Motorola Moto G(2015)2186
OnePlus X2661
JetStreamHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)21.552
Apple iPhone SE120.4
GFXBench T-Rex HD on-screenHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)20
Apple iPhone SE59.55
Motorola Moto G(2015)9.6
OnePlus X23
GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 on-screenHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)8.4
Apple iPhone SE56.65
Motorola Moto G(2015)3.9
OnePlus X10
Basemark OS IIHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)630.66
Apple iPhone SE2098.66
Motorola Moto G(2015)581
OnePlus X1185.66
Geekbench 3 single-coreHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)700.33
Apple iPhone SE2559.33
Motorola Moto G(2015)528
OnePlus X910.33
Geekbench 3 multi-coreHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)2157
Apple iPhone SE4454.66
Motorola Moto G(2015)1554
OnePlus X2415.33


Camera

The 13MP main camera and 5MP selfie shooter can take good photos, but only in ideal circumstances. Both struggle in low light.


I just love it when little things make a meaningful impact! As other recent Samsung phones, the Galaxy A3 (2016) uses the home button as a camera shortcut – a double press brings the camera app forth from any screen. It’s a shortcut I found very convenient during my testing, even though the camera tends to be slow to launch from a cold start.

The camera app itself is functional enough given the phone’s category, although it is not as sophisticated as those on top-tier models. HDR mode, for example, has to be enabled manually and adds a delay between individual shots, not to mention that it caps image resolution at 8MP for some reason. There’s a PRO mode as well, giving you manual controls over ISO and white balance, but you can’t control focus or the shutter speed.


Image quality is a mixed bag overall. The good news is that the Galaxy A3 (2016), equipped with a 13MP F1.9 camera, takes detailed photos with pleasing colors, as long as it is provided with plenty of light. The bad news is that its camera is slow to focus and struggles to do so in low-light situations. Making matters worse, if you press the shutter, a shot will be taken immediately, whether the focus has been set or not. This greatly increases the chance of ending up with a blurry image. The Night Mode works well for images of far-away objects, as seen in the samples below, but I wouldn’t advise you to use it for party photos of people. As for the 5MP F1.9 front-facing camera, I was able to take good photos in daytime, but its low-light images turned out lifeless and often blurry.



Taking a picLower is betterTaking an HDR pic(sec)Lower is betterCamSpeed scoreHigher is betterCamSpeed score with flashHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)2.9
4.3
601
368
Apple iPhone SE2.2
2.5
720
399
Motorola Moto G(2015)3.4
5
658
641
OnePlus X2
3.2
711
543

To end this section on a more positive note, I’d say that I’m very pleased with the quality of the 1080p videos I recorded. The Galaxy A3 (2016) manages to capture plenty of detail and clear sound, without introducing any blurring in low-light situations. But again, its camera is slow to focus on its own while capturing footage.



Multimedia

Decent sound and screen size make for a phone suitable for watching the occasional YouTube video.

There’s a single loudspeaker at the bottom of the Galaxy A3 (2016), and the most annoying thing about it is that I sometimes covered it by accident while watching videos. Other than that, sound coming out of it is mostly okay – sufficiently loud, without crackles at high volume. Pairing it with the 4.7-inch screen makes the phone suitable for catching up on my YouTube subscriptions, although I’d much rather use something bigger, more substantial for longer video sessions.

Samsung’s own photo gallery works pretty well. It is quick to load thumbnails, it offers a range of image editing tools, and when sharing photos, the most recently used apps are automatically brought to the top of the list. If you don’t like it for some reason, Google Photos comes pre-installed as well, with its built-in image backup feature.

Headphones output power(Volts)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)0.54
Apple iPhone SE0.47
Motorola Moto G(2015)0.377
OnePlus X0.44
Loudspeaker loudness(dB)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)69
Apple iPhone SE72
Motorola Moto G(2015)78.5
OnePlus X73


Call quality and battery life

Nothing major to complain about.

Throughout my testing of the 2016-edition Samsung Galaxy A3, I’ve experienced no issues with reception or audio quality during calls. The earpiece is loud, and sounds coming out of it are clear, much as is the case on the other side of the line.

As far as battery life goes, I’d say that I’m mostly satisfied, as the new Galaxy A3 will last through a day of moderate use. There’s room for improvement, however. I noticed that the phone tends to lose quite a lot of charge in standby, means that nightly recharges would be a must for many users. Heavy users might want to bring a power bank along. The phone’s 2300mAh battery can be easily drained in an afternoon’s time if it is frequently used for demanding tasks like taking lots of photos or for GPS navigation.

Battery life(hours)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)10h 8 min(Excellent)
Apple iPhone SE7h 41 min(Average)
Motorola Moto G(2015)8h 3 min(Average)
OnePlus X5h 57 min(Poor)
Full Charge(hours)Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy A3(2016)1h 52 min
Apple iPhone SE2h 35 min
Motorola Moto G(2015)4h 11 min
OnePlus X2h 1 min

Conclusion


I suppose we all have that friend who wouldn’t care what hardware or operating system goes into a phone. As long as it looks pretty, they’ll get it. That’s the kind of people who will be drawn by the Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016), as its gorgeous design and eye-catching display are its most alluring features. Indeed, Samsung has managed to build a device that looks and feels a lot like one of its flagships, despite being of a much lower class.

Behind this beautiful facade stands a typical mid-range phone – one that isn’t necessarily special in any way, one that has its imperfections, but also one that gets the job done without costing an arm and a leg. It’s not the best device if you’re looking for the maximum bang for your buck. It’s not the ultimate cameraphone or the handset that would survive an earthquake unscathed either. Folks needing a stylish, compact phone, however, might want to give the new Galaxy A3 a try.

Software version: Android 5.1.1 Lollipop; Build number: LMY47X.A310FXXU1AOL7

Video Thumbnail

Update: You can now read our Galaxy A3 (2017) review!


Pros

  • Beautifully designed for its class
  • Compact, easy to operate with one hand
  • Bright screen with great color accuracy (in Basic mode)
  • Good video quality

Cons

  • Main camera is slow to focus
  • Poor low-light performance from both cameras
  • Occasional lags and slowdowns
  • Still behind on software updates

PhoneArena Rating:

7.0

User Rating:

9.2
5 Reviews

Recommended Stories

Loading Comments...
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless