Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Specs

Description

The Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo is a low-end Android smartphone. It flaunts a 850MHz processor, 512MB of RAM, 3-inch QVGA touchscreen and 4GB of internal storage. Also, there's a modest, 2-megapixel camera on its back.

This device is also known as Samsung S5310

Pros

  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.28 x 0.46 inches)

Cons

  • Thick body (0.46 inches)
I want it 2 users
I have it 2 users
I had it 7 users

Popular Comparisons

The Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo is most commonly compared with these phones:

Specs Compare

Display

Benchmarks
Size: 3.0-inch
Resolution: 320 x 240 px, 133 PPI
Technology: TFT
Screen-to-body: 45.88 %
Features: Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor

Hardware

Benchmarks
System chip: Broadcom BCM21654/G
Processor: Single core, 850 MHz, ARM Cortex-A9
GPU: VideoCore IV
RAM: 0.5GB
Internal storage: 4GB
Storage expansion: microSDHC up to 32 GB
OS: Android (4.1) Screenshots
Device type: Smartphone

Battery

Capacity: 1200 mAh
Type: Li - Ion, User replaceable

Camera

Rear: Single camera Camera samples
Main camera: 2 MP (CMOS image sensor)
Video recording: 320x240 (QVGA) (15 fps)
Dimensions: 4.13 x 2.28 x 0.46 inches
(105 x 57.8 x 11.8 mm)
Weight: 3.55 oz (100.5 g)
Colors: Blue, White, Gray

Cellular

3G: Bands 1(2100), 8(900)
Data Speed: HSDPA 7.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS
Dual SIM: Yes

Multimedia

Benchmarks
Headphones: 3.5mm jack
Speakers: Earpiece, Loudspeaker
Features: Album art cover, Background playback
Radio: FM, Stereo, RDS, Recording option

Connectivity & Features

Bluetooth: 4.0
Wi-Fi: 802.11 b, g, n
Wi-Fi Direct
USB: microUSB, USB 2.0
Features: Charging, Mass storage device
Location: GPS, A-GPS, Glonass
Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass
Other: Tethering, Computer sync, OTA sync

Regulatory Approval

FCC approval:
Date approved: Nov 26, 2013
FCC ID value: A3LGTS5310E
Measured SAR:
Head: 0.95 W/kg
Body: 0.99 W/kg
Simultaneous Transmission: 1.11 W/kg
Wireless Router: 0.99 W/kg

Availability

Officially announced: Apr 03, 2013
Despite our efforts to provide full and correct specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please

LET US KNOW.

If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.

News

User Reviews

Overall User Rating
Build quality
6
Camera quality
3.3
Performance
3.3
Display
4
Battery life and charging
5.8
Rating breakdown (out of 10)
2
Worst phone I have ever owned
Phone owned for less than a year

I had this phone for 2 months and it is terrible.
It has a lot of touchscreen issues, it is slow, it has a terrible camera, not so good battery and the back cover is breaking. Plus, the screen has a painfully low resolution and size. Do not recommend

Read Full Review
4
Stay away - how was this released?
Phone owned for less than 3 months

I bought this phone whilst looking to temporarily replace my S3. After purchasing I was shocked. I don't know how this phone was even approved for production. It's an absolute insult to the consumer. It cannot text, or call, or scroll without crashing and freezing repetitively.

It is impossible to run anything other than default apps.
Not even snapchat works, because for SOME reason, this phone 96% of the time cannot play video files.

Read Full Review
4
Don't bother it's woefully underpowered
Phone owned for less than a month

I got hold of this phone very cheaply from Virgin while waiting for my new iphone to be delivered. I figured 'well it's not cost me a lot so it's better than nothing.....'. Well nothing can prepare you for quite how slow this thing is, you might as well use a pidgeon!

Samsung take note of what Nokia have done, the Lumia 520 is how a cheap smart phone should be.....

Read Full Review
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless