Samsung Galaxy A11 User Reviews

Overall User Rating
Build quality
8
Camera quality
5
Performance
6
Display
7.5
Battery life and charging
9.5
Rating breakdown (out of 10)
We may receive a small affiliate commission if you purchase from these offers.
Sim-free
Amazon
$290
User reviews
7

Decent I'll say

Phone owned for less than a year

I've used this but I'll say it's ok and it's sort of beginner friendly but with this u can get a samsung one ui phone for a cheap price! (On other reviews you'll find a bad reviews ) I would say this phone is currently my main phone but I don't recommend people who wants a perfect phone even with cheap ones but there are better alternatives than this phone or if u have this phone untouched just install lineage os but it's impossible since this phone is a bit unstable with the twrp app to flash twrp.

Read Full Review
8

Very nice for a budget Samsung device... if only it were more budget friendly...

Phone owned for less than 3 months

I was looking for a new device after a watery mishap with my Motorola Moto E5 Cruise (yes, I know it has a water-repellant nanocoating, but that doesn't always help when the water puddle is deep... and in your own poncho pocket... for an extended period of time). While the battery capacity of the old phone suffered badly, I was able to get the rest of the phone operating mostly okay after a good dry-out, but after a couple of days of that I decided it would be safest to get a new device. I had already been looking at the LG Harmony 4 as a contender at the time, but found this Samsung Galaxy A11 to be potentially a better choice. I had looked at HMD Nokia's, too, but found them to be suffering from a lack of good reviews, and an overabundance of poor reviews, on the carrier website. At $109.99, this was more than twice what I would normally pay for a new phone, but it had the Samsung brand on it that Android users often swear by, so what was the harm, right? Well, the phone works well overall. Sure - there are a few things about it that are annoying - I wish the phone had not cost quite as much, and I wish the phone did not have so much bloatware on it from the carrier and the manufacturer, and I wish the phone had a little more RAM; but, overall, this was not a bad phone. It has Qualcomm's Snapdragon 450 in it, which I believe to be superior to the MediaTek Helio P22 in the primary contender, and now that LG may soon announce that even their existing phones will no longer get software support of any kind (if the rumors can be believed), it is becoming more clear that I chose right; however, the new Cricket Influence (designed and manufactured through the relatively new collaboration of Cricket, Emblem Solutions, and VinGroup... but not covered by this website anywhere) is now available a month after my purchase, is decent for a budget offering, and has a newer and more efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 in it with 3GB of RAM, for less than half of the cost of the Samsung. If I had waited just a month more, I could have gotten that for $39.99, rather than spending $109.99 for the Samsung, so I could have saved a lot of money and gotten a phone that may have had almost the same overall functionality for me (based on my meager usage of smartphones in general). I still think I made the right choice, but I can't help but also see the $70 I could have kept in my wallet.

Read Full Review
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless