Samsung GALAXY W Specs

7.5
PhoneArena Score
Samsung GALAXY W Review
8.1

Description

Samsung GALAXY W comes with a single-core 1.4GHz processor, 3.7" 480x800 pixels LCD display, 5MP camera, 14.4Mbps HSDPA, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi and a 1500mAh battery. As usual we will have TouchWiz all over it with Samsung's multimedia and social Hubs as well as Kies Air for wireless syncing.

This device is also known as Samsung I8150, Samsung GALAXY Wonder

Cons

  • Thick body (0.45 inches)
I want it 41 users
I have it 17 users
I had it 9 users

Popular Comparisons

The Samsung GALAXY W is most commonly compared with these phones:

Specs Compare

Display

Size: 3.7-inch
Resolution: 800 x 480 px, 252 PPI
Technology: TFT
Screen-to-body: 56.25 %
Colors: 16 777 216
Features: Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor

Hardware

Processor: Single core, 1400 MHz
RAM: 0.5GB
Internal storage: 4GB
Storage expansion: microSDHC up to 32 GB
OS: Android (2.3)
Device type: Smartphone

Battery

Capacity: 1500 mAh
Type: Li - Ion, User replaceable

Camera

Rear: Single camera
Main camera: 5 MP (Autofocus)
Flash: LED
Video recording: 1280x720 (HD) (30 fps)
Features:
Video calling
Front: 0.3 MP VGA
Dimensions: 4.55 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches
(115.5 x 60 x 11.5 mm)
Weight: 3.93 oz (111.5 g)
Colors: Black, White

Cellular

3G: Bands 8(900), 1(2100)
Data Speed: HSDPA 14.4 Mbit/s, HSPA, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS

Multimedia

Headphones: 3.5mm jack
Radio: FM, Stereo, RDS

Connectivity & Features

Bluetooth: 3.0
Wi-Fi: 802.11 b, g, n
USB: microUSB, USB 2.0
Features: Mass storage device, Charging
Location: GPS
Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass
Other: Computer sync, OTA sync

Phone features

Notifications: Music ringtones (MP3), Polyphonic ringtones, Vibration, Flight mode, Silent mode, Speakerphone
Other features: Voice recording

Regulatory Approval

FCC approval:
FCC ID value: A3LGTI8150
Measured SAR:
Head: 0.49 W/kg
Body: 0.95 W/kg

Availability

Officially announced: Aug 24, 2011
Despite our efforts to provide full and correct Samsung GALAXY W specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please

LET US KNOW.

If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.

Alternative variants

Samsung Galaxy W I8150T
Differences from the main variant:
FCC approval:
Date approved: Nov 08, 2011
FCC ID value: A3LGTI8150T
Measured SAR:
Head: 0.39 W/kg
Body: 0.56 W/kg
Samsung Galaxy W I8150B
Differences from the main variant:
FCC approval:
Date approved: Sep 26, 2011
FCC ID value: A3LGTI8150B
Measured SAR:
Head: 0.43 W/kg
Body: 0.77 W/kg

News

Meet the Samsung Exhibit II 4G
We’d like to introduce you to the Samsung Exhibit II 4G, formerly known as the Ancora and called the Galaxy W overseas, which has posed for some official press photos and appears to be heading to T-Mobile. It was just a little more than a week ...
, by Ian M., 5
Meet the Samsung Exhibit II 4G
Samsung Galaxy W visits FCC with AT&T bands
The Samsung Galaxy W has just stopped by the FCC packing bands that are compatible with the AT&T network that suggests it could possibly arrive in the states sometime in the near future. The Samsung Galaxy W has all of the makings of a mid-range ...
, by Ian M., 5
Samsung Galaxy W visits FCC with AT&T bands
FCC greets T-Mobile bound Samsung T679, possibly the Samsung Galaxy W
The FCC just met with the Samsung T679 whose specs match those of the Samsung Galaxy W. We can assume that both are one and the same. The device that met with the pinstriped Fed employees is heading to T-Mobile and is equipped with a 3.7 inch WVGA di...
, by Alan Friedman, 1
FCC greets T-Mobile bound Samsung T679, possibly the Samsung Galaxy W
Images show a Samsung Galaxy W dressed in a white paint job
Just last week, we were introduced to a slew of new devices from Samsung that encompasses a wide range of categories – while getting to know their new naming system as well. One of the devices made known, the Samsung Galaxy W, was seen sporting...
, by John Velasco, 6
Images show a Samsung Galaxy W dressed in a white paint job

User Reviews

Overall User Rating
Build quality
7.7
Camera quality
7.7
Performance
8.3
Display
8.3
Battery life and charging
7
Rating breakdown (out of 10)
10
Awesome
Phone owned for more than a year

This phone is the best, it helped me in everything , my jop while traveling and in calls and it was very fast reponding to me so really its the best and i advice ppl to buy it and get a happy life with it

Read Full Review
9
Wonderful compared to it's price
Phone owned for less than 3 months

I've been using this phone for over 2 months and it's working well. Although it's got a high speed processor it's RAM isn't that good (I have to restart the phone it a couple of times per day to restart it's ram). The video quality is super cool but somehow in the still camera shoots i've seen better 5MP cameras.
However I recommend this phone for people with heavy daily usage of smart phones and for people who don't want to pay much and enjoy a great deal of features.

Read Full Review
1
Total garbage
Phone owned for less than a year

The most expensive and easily the worst phone I have ever had. Have had to have it exchanged three times in four months because it keeps failing. Overly sensitive when you don't want it to be - no sensitivity when you want to actually use it. Piss poor functionality - too complicated, difficult, functions too hidden. Does things you will never need but can't do basic obvious things - like delete draft messages! Microphone keeps failing, rubbish reception, rubbish battery power, rubbish screen time. Hate, hate, hate it. Total dross. People just get seduced by looks over function.

Read Full Review
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless