Nokia E52 Specs
Popular Comparisons
The is most commonly compared with these phones:
Specs Compare
Links
Bought this after his E7 2ND because I wanted to use a smaller phone with similar functionally as E72. It definitely served the purpose. Data transfer was easy. Handling was perfect. Robust with metal body. Used it for almost 2 years without any issue. Small but good business phone
I had this phone for about 2 weeks. The classic design is extremely nice, although I do not understand why would they release both a standard and a querty keypad unit. The qwerty is definetly superior.
The display is looking good ,rather small though. Still ,I found the colors pretty bright .
As most symbian units, it is quite laggy. I experienced slight lag on menu,camera,even when accesing contacts. However ,it is not that bad ,and you can get the hang of it.
Camera is good for it's capabilities,audio is average,and I find it a bit overpriced.
Overall,this phone clearly has a targeted market - bussines. The 600Mhz processor can handle most situations,but do not expect lighting fast speed.
I got this phone because it has a music player and a physical numeric keypad for texting. The music player doesn't detect all the songs, for no apparent reason. if you tell it to refresh, it may randomly find more songs, it might lose some. The texting is unusably slow- if you type faster than the phone can handle, it just skips your letter. This is basically anything more than 2 keys per second.
I don't care about any other great things this phone might have. It is worthless to me.