Nokia E52 Specs

8.5
PhoneArena Score
Nokia E52 Review
8.2

Description

Nokia E52 comes as the successor of Nokia E51. It features QVGA display, 3.2-megapixel camera, GPS, Wi-Fi, stereo Bluetooh and microSDHC card slot.

Pros

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)

Cons

  • Thick body (0.39 inches)
I want it 5 users
I have it 7 users
I had it 33 users

Popular Comparisons

The is most commonly compared with these phones:

Specs Compare

Display

Size: 2.4-inch
Resolution: 320 x 240 px, 167 PPI
Technology: TFT
Screen-to-body: 31.35 %
Colors: 16 777 216
Features: Ambient light sensor

Hardware

Processor: Single core, 600 MHz, ARM11
Internal storage: 0.06GB
Storage expansion: microSDHC up to 16 GB
OS: Symbian (9.3), S60 3rd Edition, Feature Pack 2
ROM: 256 MB
Device type: Smartphone

Battery

Capacity: 1500 mAh
Type: Li - Polymer, User replaceable

Camera

Rear: Single camera
Main camera: 3.2 MP
Flash: LED
Video recording: 640x480 (VGA) (15 fps)
Features: Video calling
Front: Yes
Dimensions: 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches
(116 x 49 x 9.9 mm)
Weight: 3.46 oz (98.0 g)
Features: Numeric keypad, Soft keys, Notification light
Keys: Right: Volume control, Camera shutter, Other

Cellular

3G: Bands 8(900), 1(2100)
Data Speed: HSDPA 10.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 2 Mbit/s, UMTS

Multimedia

Headphones: 3.5mm jack
Screen mirroring: DLNA
Radio: FM, Stereo, Visual Radio

Connectivity & Features

Bluetooth: 2.0, EDR
Wi-Fi: 802.11 b, g
USB: microUSB, USB 2.0
Location: GPS
Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass
Other: UPnP, Tethering, Computer sync, OTA sync, SyncML, VoIP

Phone features

Notifications: Music ringtones (MP3), Polyphonic ringtones, Vibration, Phone profiles, Speakerphone
Other features: Voice dialing, Voice commands, Voice recording, Push-to-Talk

Regulatory Approval

FCC approval:
Date approved: Jul 03, 2009
FCC ID value: PYARM-469
Measured SAR:
Head: 0.65 W/kg
Measured in: 1900 MHz
Body: 0.24 W/kg
Measured in: 1900 MHz
EU SAR:
Head: 1.23 W/kg

Availability

Officially announced: May 06, 2009
Despite our efforts to provide full and correct specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please

LET US KNOW.

If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.

User Reviews

Overall User Rating
Build quality
9.3
Camera quality
6
Performance
6
Display
7
Battery life and charging
8.5
Rating breakdown (out of 10)
8
After E72
Phone owned for more than a year

Bought this after his E7 2ND because I wanted to use a smaller phone with similar functionally as E72. It definitely served the purpose. Data transfer was easy. Handling was perfect. Robust with metal body. Used it for almost 2 years without any issue. Small but good business phone

Read Full Review
7
Not bad,neither good
Phone owned for less than a month

I had this phone for about 2 weeks. The classic design is extremely nice, although I do not understand why would they release both a standard and a querty keypad unit. The qwerty is definetly superior.
The display is looking good ,rather small though. Still ,I found the colors pretty bright .
As most symbian units, it is quite laggy. I experienced slight lag on menu,camera,even when accesing contacts. However ,it is not that bad ,and you can get the hang of it.
Camera is good for it's capabilities,audio is average,and I find it a bit overpriced.
Overall,this phone clearly has a targeted market - bussines. The 600Mhz processor can handle most situations,but do not expect lighting fast speed.

Read Full Review
6
Texting unresponsive
Phone owned for less than a month

I got this phone because it has a music player and a physical numeric keypad for texting. The music player doesn't detect all the songs, for no apparent reason. if you tell it to refresh, it may randomly find more songs, it might lose some. The texting is unusably slow- if you type faster than the phone can handle, it just skips your letter. This is basically anything more than 2 keys per second.

I don't care about any other great things this phone might have. It is worthless to me.

Read Full Review
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless