Home BenQ Phones BenQ C900 Updated: Jul 30, 2014, 8:11 AM BenQ C900 Specs Battery 799 mAh Display 64 x 98 px Description Entry level Tri-mode CDMA phone, featuring multiple language support, text messaging templates and internet I want it 0 users I have it 0 users I had it 0 users Popular Comparisons The BenQ C900 is most commonly compared with these phones: BenQ C900 vs AT&T Z222 BenQ C900 vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) BenQ C900 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 BenQ C900 vs Samsung Galaxy Note4 BenQ C900 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Specs Compare Display Resolution: 64 x 98 px Battery Capacity: 799 mAh Type: Li - Ion, User replaceable Design Size comparison Dimensions: 4.81 x 1.97 x 0.88 inches (122 x 50 x 22 mm) Weight: 4.23 oz (120.0 g) Cellular AMPS: 800 MHz Phone features Notifications: Vibration, Phone profiles Regulatory Approval FCC approval: Date approved: Jul 11, 2002 FCC ID value: JVPH0523 Despite our efforts to provide full and correct BenQ C900 specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please LET US KNOW. If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page. Latest News Apple's iOS 18.4 beta 1 arrives and includes a new drawing style for Image Playground Apple just spiced up this otherwise boring app Galaxy S24 Ultra owners share images of what the phone did to their pockets iPhone 17 Air to borrow Apple’s C1 modem from iPhone 16e More iPhone and iPad users will finally get to experience this soon The excitement around iPhone 16e has come crashing down hard Popular stories T-Mobile users can get iPhone 16 for the price of a budget phone (no new line) [UPDATED] Verizon customers will face financial consequences because of the company's short-sightedness There has never been a worse time to be a T-Mobile customer with a OnePlus phone Samsung Galaxy tri-foldable only available in select markets, will not feature crease improvements T-Mobile and Metro announce iPhone 16e "on Us" deals iPhone SE 4 will have worse cellular coverage but will also save Apple money