Why the Pixel Tablet's cancellation makes sense in light of a possible Android and Chrome OS merge
AI generated merged Android plus Chrome logo | Generated with Pixel Studio
The Google Pixel Tablet project has reportedly been canceled, but a second iteration of the tablet is still expected to launch in 2025. Google insiders report that there will be no third version of the Pixel Tablet. This news might come as a surprise to some, especially considering the recent release of the Pixel Tablet and the generally positive reception it received. However, when considering Google's history with hardware products, it's not entirely unexpected. Google has a history of giving up on projects that don't immediately dominate the market. Remember Google Glass? Or Google Plus? In the case of the Pixel Tablet, it seems that it simply failed to meet expectations for a high-end Android experience, particularly when compared to competitors like Samsung and Apple.
But perhaps there's a deeper reason for Google's decision to pull the plug on the Pixel Tablet project. It's possible that the company is strategically reallocating its resources to focus on the rumored Chrome OS / Android Unified OS. If Google truly wants this ambitious project to be a success, it wouldn't make much sense to continue investing heavily in the Pixel Tablet in its current form. This line of thinking makes the cancellation of the Pixel Tablet 3, rather than the Pixel Tablet 2, more understandable. Google likely needs more time to fully integrate the tablet experience into its unified operating system vision.
However, there's a wrench in the works. Recent developments indicate that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is pushing for Google to sell Chrome. This raises significant questions about the future of the Unified Chrome/Android OS project and even Chrome OS in general. Could Google's grand plan for a unified operating system be derailed by antitrust concerns?
A 2021 early concept render of the Google Pixel Tablet | Image credit — Letsgodigital
Google and the DOJ
In August, a federal judge concluded that Google was operating as a monopoly, specifically leveraging its dominant position in the search market to stifle competition. The DOJ has proposed some drastic measures to address this, including breaking up the company. Google has vehemently opposed these recommendations, arguing in a blog post by its Chief Legal Officer that such actions would negatively impact users and innovation. They claim that these proposals would hinder their ability to provide free services and develop new products.
It remains to be seen how the DOJ's proposals will affect Google's plans for a Chrome OS / Android Unified OS. However, it's clear that the company is facing some significant challenges in the tablet market. The Pixel Tablet, despite its positive reviews, was not a runaway commercial success. Now, with the added pressure from the DOJ to change its business practices, Google's hardware ambitions are facing more uncertainty than ever.
The future of Chrome OS
The DOJ's scrutiny of Chrome raises interesting questions about the future of Chrome OS. Could Google be forced to sell off its popular operating system? And what would that mean for users who have come to rely on Chromebooks for their affordability and simplicity? If Google is forced to divest from Chrome, it could potentially open up the market for other players, leading to more competition and innovation. However, it could also lead to fragmentation and confusion for consumers.
Perhaps this situation will push Google to rethink its approach to hardware altogether. Maybe instead of trying to directly compete with Apple and Samsung in the tablet market, they will focus on creating devices that are specifically designed for their unified operating system. This could lead to the development of innovative new form factors and user experiences that are tailored to Google's strengths in software and services.
As a tech enthusiast and consumer of Google products, I'm fascinated by the unfolding drama surrounding Google's hardware ambitions and the DOJ's antitrust actions. I'm eager to see what Google does next, particularly if they will be able to develop a successful Chrome OS tablet that truly differentiates itself from the competition. I'm also keenly interested in seeing how the DOJ's proposals will affect Google's business as a whole.
I believe it's crucial for Google to remain a strong player in the hardware market. They have the potential to create truly innovative devices that push the boundaries of technology. I'm hopeful that Google will be able to navigate these challenges and continue to release exciting products that benefit consumers, while it navigates its latest challenges concerning government regulation. It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the coming years.
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless
Things that are NOT allowed: