Every time a new processor is announced, the manufacturer calls out "we have x percent better performance, y percent better power efficiency". That's all fine and dandy, but we — the consumers — can't really check if those numbers are close to reality. Specifically in the world of smartphones — different manufacturers take those processors and slap them on different systems, with their own cooling solutions, internal designs, and software.
So, in the case of Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm claimed:
10% faster CPU and GPU
30% better power efficiency
20% better performance per watt AI engine
We did test a few phones with the new Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and we know it performs great, but how can we compare it cleanly against the 8 Gen 1? Well, we need two phones that are very, very close.
This is where Red Magic helps
Red Magic 7 left; Red Magic 7S Pro right (Image Credit - PhoneArena)
Red Magic is a company that specializes in making gaming smartphones — edgy designs, top-tier specs, and shoulder buttons for comfortable gaming are all in the mix. And, this year, the manufacturer released two phones — the Red Magic 7 and Red Magic 7s Pro. You guessed it, one is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, the other — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
And eventhough they run very similar software and probably have very similar internals, we have another thing in these phones that will equalize results — internal fans.
Red Magic 7S even shows off its fan (Image Credit - PhoneArena)
With cooling taken care of, we can confidently push the two Snapdragons through multiple benchmarks, knowing that they will (or should) barely throttle. Thus, we will get a much clearer image of what their max performance is, as well as how much battery they actually drain. Fun, no?
Step 1: 3DMark torture test
3DMark results (Image Credit - PhoneArena)
3DMark's Wildlife Extreme is a pretty... well, extreme test, well deserving its name. It runs a set of very demanding graphical scenes, and it circles through them a total of 20 times, tracking performance, throttling, and battery drain for the entire process. Yep, that sounds perfect for what we are trying to do! So, here goes:
Recommended Stories
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress
Highest Loop Score
Lowest Loop Score
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2630
2444
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
2814
2798
OK, how did we do on the first test? On the highest loop score, we got about 7% better performance on the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which is close to that 10% promise. On the lowest loop score, we got an actual 14.5% improvement with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, so it looks like this chip is tougher to scare with heavy graphics.
Now, what about energy efficiency?
Battery drop during 3DMark
Start
End
Change
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
72%
46%
-26%
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
72%
55%
-17%
Test corrupted: in a quick update, we'd like to point out that the 7S Pro has a 5,000 mAh battery where the Red Magic 7 has 4,500 mAh. We'd like to apologize for this mishap as we take steps to do better next time. Keep these specs in mind when reading the original text.
We started the whole ordeal with 72% in both phones (we purposefully chose not to charge them to 100%, as that may introduce more battery reading deviations). The Red Magic 7 dropped by 26%, the Red Magic 7S Pro lost 17%. Lo and behold — that is actually 34.6% better battery endurance!
Step 2: Geekbench 5
Geekbench 5 results (Image Credit - PhoneArena)
We let the phones cool down and moved to the next one. Geekbench is a strictly CPU-oriented benchmarking tool, which runs the processor through a set of calculations and determines how fast it was to complete them. This one doesn't do repetitions on its own, so we ran Geekbench 3 consecutive times per phone, and tracked both result deviations and battery drop:
Geekbench 5
Loop 1: Single-core
Loop 1: Multi-core
Loop 5: Single-core
Loop 5: Multi-core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1242
3776
1239
3718
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
1332
4270
1334
4259
We got pretty consistent points throughout all 5 loops — maybe the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 throttled by a little bit, but such a score deviation is negligible. Let's compare the first loop results and see if the performance promises were realistic.
For single-core performance, the 8+ Gen 1 had a 7.2% better score. On multi-core, it got a respectable 13% bonus points. So, again, we can say Qualcomm's promises have been kept.
On to battery drain during the Geekbench 5 test:
Battery drain Geekbench
Start
End
Change
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
45%
37%
-8%
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
53%
48%
-5%
This is too small of a change to make any conclusions, but we can see where the trend was going with this one — the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 was draining less power, even though it was crunching better numbers.
Step 3: GFXBench
GFXBench results (Image Credit - PhoneArena)
After another cooldown, we moved on to GFXBench. This tool is quite long in the tooth — modern smartphones are pretty good at eating its benchmarks up. But the Aztec Ruins scene is relatively new and still pretty heavy. Again, GFXBench doesn't do cycles on its own, so we ran Aztec Ruins 5 consecutive times on both phones, then tracked results:
GFXBench Aztec Ruins
Loop 1
Loop 5
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3725 frames (58 FPS)
3714 frames (58 FPS)
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
4042 frames (63 FPS)
4078 frames (63 FPS)
Qualcomm says we should observe a 10% better GPU performance, just like with the CPU. So, results? A consistent 8.5%-9.8% improvement in framerates through all 5 loops. Again, pretty close!
Battery:
Battery drain GFXBench
Start
End
Change
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
36%
27%
9%
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
47%
41%
6%
Again, not a huge drop, but we definitely see the trend repeat itself.
Conclusion
Red Magic 7S and Red Magic 7 (Image Credit - PhoneArena)
Wait a second, what about the AI performance? We are going to have to leave you hanging on that test, as the Red Magic 7S doesn't seem to be giving benchmarking apps proper access to its Neural Processing Unit at the moment, resulting in some pretty low scores on the benchmarks. We'd love to revisit if this gets solved by a patch down the line.
But so far, we managed to test the performance of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 on a pretty level playing field — or as equal as we can get, standing on the consumer end of the market. Did the 8+ Gen 1 live up to what was promised? Well... yes.
Of course, we have some deviation from test to test, it's not realistic to expect exact 10% or 30% improvements. But we got very, very close, no complaints there! Is Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 the king of Android chips? Well... it could be, but that MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ seems like a very worthy competitor.
Feel free to drop a line in the comments if you want to see how the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 stacks up against the Dimensity 9000+!
Follow us on social media to catch the latest trending stories, watch exclusive videos, and join the conversation with our vibrant community!
Preslav, a member of the PhoneArena team since 2014, is a mobile technology enthusiast with a penchant for integrating tech into his hobbies and work. Whether it's writing articles on an iPad Pro, recording band rehearsals with multiple phones, or exploring the potential of mobile gaming through services like GeForce Now and Steam Link, Preslav's approach is hands-on and innovative. His balanced perspective allows him to appreciate both Android and iOS ecosystems, focusing on performance, camera quality, and user experience over brand loyalty.
Recommended Stories
Loading Comments...
COMMENT
All comments need to comply with our
Community Guidelines
Phonearena comments rules
A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless
Things that are NOT allowed: