Galaxy A54 - Samsung now makes cheaper phones worse to get people to spend more on Galaxy S23?
This article may contain personal views and opinion from the author.
I’m not going to lie… Trying to make sense out of the mid-range phone market in 2023 might be the trickiest part of writing about smartphones.
In fact, the sales of the company’s cheaper phones (particularly the ones cheaper than the Galaxy A54), actually tell us the South Korean brand is doing a better job in the budget segment - a bittersweet win considering the flagships “S” series would bring higher profit margins but struggle to move as many units as Samsung would wish.
But to make things more complicated, new mid-range Galaxy phones also must be better than their predecessors, and competing mid-rangers from other brands. And this is where the new Galaxy A54 might find itself in a bit of an existential crisis. Let's take a look...
Shockingly, Galaxy A54 looks older than the four-year-old Galaxy A51 - Samsung has some explaining to do...
The 2019 Galaxy A51 on the left, the 2021 Galaxy A52 in the middle, and the brand new Galaxy A54 on the right. We see a trend of thicker display borders on the newer phones.
Now, before you tell me about the iPhone SE down in the comments (and by all means, feel free to do that) and how old Apple’s mid-ranger looks, I’ll go ahead and tell you that this story is about Samsung. But to jump the gun, as dated as the iPhone SE looks in 2023, at least it looks just as ancient as its predecessor.
Despite having a larger screen, the 2019 Galaxy A51 is more compact, more modern-looking, and 30g lighter than the Galaxy A54.
Sure, you’d expect the bezels on the Galaxy A54 to look thicker than those on the flagship Galaxy S23, but what had me surprised was that they make Samsung’s 2019 Galaxy A51 look like a phonefromthefuture. Seriously, if next year Samsung launched the Galaxy A55 and it looked like the 2019 Galaxy A51. that’d be... an upgrade!
With that being said, although I’d argue most people choose a new phone by looking at it/holding it, aesthetic design isn't all that matters about a phone. And if that's where you expect things to pick up for the Galaxy A54, well... you might be surprised.
Cheaper Galaxy A34 with MediaTek chip beats Galaxy A54 running Samsung's Exynos in early real-world speed test
In a recent real-world speed test, the $300 Galaxy A34 was faster in opening apps than the Galaxy A54. Final score? 9-20.
Now, design aside, there’s another potential issue with the Galaxy A54…
Although the MediaTek Dimensity 1080 used in the Galaxy A34 and the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 are about on par according to benchmarks, the cheaper phone seems to be snappier.
Anyway, the real question we should be asking isn’t why the Galaxy A34 appears to be faster than the Galaxy A54 but why is the performance between two phones in a rather different price segment so similar in the first place?
Of course, for people in the US, this wouldn’t really matter, as the Galaxy A34 isn’t expected to launch there in the first place - but that can't an excuse. The Galaxy A54 is just about the only Samsung mid-range phone sold in the US, which should only be a reason for it to be… as good as possible. Right?
Galaxy A54 - a very good $450 package but Google's Pixel flagships will eat Samsung’s phone for breakfast (Pixel 7a is almost here now)
Would you buy a Pixel instead of the Galaxy A54?
So, yes… The Galaxy A54 remains one of the most appealing mid-range phones on the global scene but unlike previous years (I'm referring specifically to the Snapdragon-powered Galaxy A52s), a great deal of the appeal is that the A54 is going to be sold in more regions of the world compared to competing devices - availability counts. Apart from that:
- Galaxy A54 promises a brighter display than the Galaxy A53
- Galaxy A54 brings a new, larger primary camera sensor, which should help with photos and videos at night
- Galaxy A54 offers 4 years of Android updates and 5 years of security patches, which is a valid reason to choose it over a Chinese phone with better specs
And yet, if the availability stars align for you, the Galaxy A54 is about to face the toughest competition Samsung’s ever seen in the mid-range phone segment.
Not only is the flagship Pixel 7 only $70 more expensive than the Galaxy A54 right now, but Google’s 2021 flagship phones are cheaper (!) than Samsung’s new mid-ranger. You can currently find a renewed Google Pixel 6 for just over $200 on Amazon, while the amazing Google Pixel 6 Pro can cost less than $350.
Even if you don’t have an extra $70 to spare or buying refurbished isn’t your thing, then waiting might be your best friend and Samsung’s biggest enemy. That's because the Google Pixel 7a (that’s leaking all over the place now) is knocking on the door. With a flagship-grade Tensor G2 chip, rumored wireless charging, and Google’s expert camera magic, the Pixel 7a is shaping up to be everything the Galaxy A54 wants to be but can’t.
Even if you don’t have an extra $70 to spare or buying refurbished isn’t your thing, then waiting might be your best friend and Samsung’s biggest enemy. That's because the Google Pixel 7a (that’s leaking all over the place now) is knocking on the door. With a flagship-grade Tensor G2 chip, rumored wireless charging, and Google’s expert camera magic, the Pixel 7a is shaping up to be everything the Galaxy A54 wants to be but can’t.
Everything Everywhere All at once going wrong with Samsung’s mid-range phones: How far (back) is Samsung going to go?
It's getting increasingly harder for Samsung to make "the perfect mid-range phone" as the company also makes the flagship Galaxy S23 and wants people to buy... more of it. It’s a tricky balancing act where Samsung has a lot to lose. Unlike Google, which doesn't even rely on selling phones to make money. It's what one would call "the perfect storm".
I don’t know if it’s the financial crisis or a sheer lack of will but something got to Samsung. You don’t make your new phones look worse than their predecessors for no reason. And because this is an editorial piece, where I get to share my take, the way I see it is that Samsung was caught unprepared. By a number of factors...
- The global chip shortage
- The global financial crisis and inflation
- Google’s super-aggressively priced Pixel phones
- Apple's incredible ability to sell old/refurbished iPhones
- And most importantly, the high bar that Samsung set for itself some time back in 2019
Of course, Samsung doesn't want to make worse phones. However, it does seem like the Galaxy A54 is the result of poor timing. If the A54 was released in (let's say) 2019, it would’ve been a hit - well, we don't know that for sure, but it would've been far more impressive, at least. Instead, Samsung released a great-looking mid-range phone four years ago, which now makes the cost-cutting, 2023 version of this phone look like a downgrade (aesthetics-wise).
Is it good enough for you? I'd wait for our full review to find out. Stay tuned!
Popular stories
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless
Things that are NOT allowed: