Pixel Tablet: The worst Android tablet Google could make is the best one Apple, Samsung never made
This article may contain personal views and opinion from the author.
Here we are! It’s time to continue our conversation about Google’s brand new Pixel Tablet. I concluded my first story by saying I find it “more exciting than the Pixel Fold”, and I… stand by that statement. But there's a "but"...
But despite that, I think I still find the Pixel Tablet exciting, and I’m willing to give it a go! I guess what’s left is to take a look at some of Google’s controversial choices for yourself, and decide if they are a deal-breaker or not…
Average display and severe lack of basic Nest Hub features make Google’s Pixel Tablet more difficult to recommend: Is Google being cheap or practical?
You're looking at the Pixel Tablet's 60Hz LCD display, which isn't all that bad considering the iPad 10 and Galaxy Tab S8's screens.
The first potential deal-breaker (for display junkies) will be Google’s decision to equip the Pixel Tablet with what seems like a rather basic display. For starters, the Pixel Tablet’s 11-inch screen uses an LCD panel instead of OLED (which would’ve provided deeper colors). But then we come to the potentially more disappointing part about the screen of the Pixel Tablet, which is the 60Hz refresh rate instead of a smoother 90/120hz panel.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think a 60Hz display is outright unacceptable for a tablet, even in 2023. You don’t tend to use a tablet the same way you use your phone - in other words, there isn’t as much scrolling involved in using a tablet, especially one like the Pixel Tablet, which seems to be designed to be used as a multimedia device, or even as a Nest Hub (in which case it’s mostly static). I’m not trying to justify Google’s decision - I’m rather trying to make sense of it.
Perhaps because Google finally switched to using a 90Hz display for their most affordable new phone (Pixel 7a), I expected the company to offer at least a 90Hz screen with the Pixel Tablet too. Is it my high expectations, or is it Google being cheap? Frankly, I’m not sure. Let me know what you think in the comments.
Samsung and Apple’s tablets don’t offer better displays than the Pixel Tablet; you’ll need a OnePlus or Xiaomi tablet to get the best display for $500 (or less)
That being said, considering the $500 price of the Pixel Tablet and the fact that it comes with a bundled dock (worth $129 according to Google), the 60Hz LCD display might not be all that shocking after all. In fact, the closest competitors to the Pixel Tablet (made by Samsung and Apple) don’t offer significantly better displays either…
- Priced at $500 for 128GB of storage, the Pixel Tablet has an 11-inch IPS LCD display with 500 nits of peak brightness, 60Hz refresh rate
- Priced at $500 for 128GB of storage, the Galaxy Tab S7 FE has a 12.4-inch TFT LCD display with 500 nits of peak brightness, 60Hz refresh rate (the pricier Galaxy Tab S8 has a similar display, which is 11-inches big)
- Both of Apple’s iPad (10th Gen) and iPad Air (5th Gen) come with 11-inch LCD displays with 500 nits of peak brightness, 60Hz refresh rate; the iPad 10 goes for $450 but that’s for 64GB of storage (the next option is 256GB at $600); the iPad Air 5 starts at $600 for $64GB of storage ($750 gets you 256GB)
Despite the fact that all of their $500 tablets come with average displays, this doesn’t mean Google, Apple, and Samsung shouldn’t do better. For example, Xiaomi’s $400 equivalent Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro and Pad 6 come with 120Hz and 144Hz refresh rate LCD panels, which will make them feel far smoother than the Pixel Tablet, Galaxy Tab S8, or iPad 10/Air. The same applies to the new OnePlus Pad ($500), which also boasts a fast 144Hz display. So… Perhaps Google, Apple, and Samsung are being stingy.
Is this 1990, Google? The Pixel Tablet’s Charging Speaker Dock isn’t exactly the Nest Hub replacement some hoped for; a charging station with an average speaker and no Bluetooth support
You won't be able to connect to the Pixel Tablet's Charging Speaker Dock wirelessly because it doesn't support Bluetooth! Facepalm.
You won't be able to connect to the Pixel Tablet's Charging Speaker Dock wirelessly because it doesn't support Bluetooth! Dutch electrical engineer Jaap Haartsen laid the foundations for the Bluetooth Wireless Technology in 1994 so Sundar Pichai & Co can kill it in 2023...
Now... This one could be blamed on my personal expectations (since Google never promised anything), but by far the most disappointing thing about the Pixel Tablet must be the fact that this one isn’t exactly the Nest Hub replacement some might’ve hoped for (some = me).
As it turns out, instead of glueing a Pixel Tablet and a Nest Hub together, Google’s decided to severely limit the functionality of the Pixel Tablet’s Charging Speaker Dock down to exactly what the name suggests. Apparently, the Charging Speaker Dock won’t be able to do much on its own (like a Nest Hub), as according to Google’s website:
- The Charging Speaker Dock won’t be able to connect to a second dock (for a more immersive sound experience, suggestion the dock will lack a basic Bluetooth connection
- The Charging Speaker Dock also won’t be able to connect to other Google-enabled smart speakers or Nest Hubs
- As it turns out, the speaker driver found in the Pixel Tablet’s dock will measure 43.5mm, which is the same size driver as the one in the smaller Nest Hub, which isn’t exactly known for its incredible sound quality.
Deal-breaker? Crazy-high prices outside of the US for Pixel Tablet make absolutely no sense considering Google's affordable Pixel phones
The Pixel Tablet starts at $500 in the US, £600 in the UK, and a whopping €680 in Europe, where the $500 Pixel 7a costs $510. What happened here, Google?
Should the Charging Speaker Dock be an essential addition to the Pixel Tablet even if you decide you don’t want/need one? Some would’ve liked to have the option to buy a Pixel Tablet without a dock - perhaps for $100 less than the $500 price for the bundle. And I can see why.
The reason those prices make little to no sense (at least to me) is because Google’s pricing strategy for their Pixel phone lineup is a polar opposite to what we see with the tablet. Take the Pixel 7a, which made its global debut alongside the Pixel Tablet:
- Pixel 7a starts at $500 in the US, £450 in the UK, and €510 in Europe
- Pixel Tablet starts at the same $500 in the US, £600 in the UK, and €680 in Europe
Speaking of pricing, the price of the Pixel Tablet’s Charging Speaker Dock (let’s assume you want to buy an additional one, or a replacement) is $129, which seems ridiculously steep considering (as we established) the dock doesn’t have any of the functionality of a Nest Hub ($99) when the Pixel Tablet isn’t attached to it, or even a basic Bluetooth connection. The practical Pixel Tablet case/stand accessory Google introduced is also rather pricey ($80).
In the end, the lack of a basic Bluetooth connection which makes connecting the Charging Speaker Dock to a second dock, a Nest Hub, Nest Audio, or Nest Mini impossible means the dock (which was supposed to make the Pixel Tablet special) will likely be practically useless when the tablet isn’t attached to it. And that’s no bueno.
And while I can forgive the small speaker driver, I’m unable to understand why Google wouldn’t give the Pixel Tablet Dock a basic Bluetooth connection so you can do basic things like listening to music wirelessly, or connecting the dock to another speaker for a more immersive sonic experience. What is this, Google? 1990?
Anyway, Welcome back to the tablet game, Google and Android! It’s nice to have you back.
Things that are NOT allowed: