Judge faults Samsung over deleted emails; Apple says Samsung seeks too much in royalties

"We intend to appeal Judge Grewal's decision to the trial judge, and if necessary, to the Court of Appeals. Samsung remains committed to complying with all information requests from the court."-Samsung statement
In ruling in favor of Apple in regard to the adverse jury instructions, the judge said Samsung "acted with conscious disregard of its obligations, or willfully" in not disabling the automatic email erasure system. He also said that Samsung should have known that Apple would have sued over patents relating to smartphones and tablets and should have kept all corresponding email. The trial starts July 30th.
"Samsung's royalty demands are multiple times more than Apple has paid any other patentees for licenses to their declared-essential patent portfolios."-Apple
While Samsung is asking for 2.4% of the full selling price of each Apple mobile device, Apple says it should pay Samsung less than half a cent for each patent infringement it committed. Samsung said the 2.4% it is asking for is consistent with what other companies pay for royalty fees. Apple has not made a counter-offer and instead Apple has refused to negotiate a settlement and has not paid Samsung anything for the use of the latter's standards-essential technology.
source: Reuters
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts: