HTC 10 vs iPhone 6s Plus, Galaxy S7, LG G5: low light camera comparison

99+comments
You can now read:



HTC is back, and it is back with a bang! It finally delivered the no-compromise flagship smartphone we've been hoping to see for the past two years. Not that the HTC One M8 and One M9 were disastrous. Quite the contrary – both were solid smartphones overall, but they were dragged down by a common weakness. As previous comparisons demonstrated, competing high-end phones ran circles around the M8 and M9's underwhelming cameras, especially in low light situations. 

The HTC 10, however, is unlike its predecessors. As you might have read in our HTC 10 review, its camera delivers terrific results, both during daytime and when light conditions are tricky. This should make today's camera comparison quite interesting, to say the least. HTC now has the opportunity to drop its underdog status and establish itself as a formidable force in the camera department. But first, it will have to endure a race against three very capable opponents, namely the iPhone 6s Plus, the Samsung Galaxy S7, and the LG G5.

For today's camera comparison, we've chosen to do things differently. We'll focus solely on these four phones' low-light performance, as that seems like a great way for their cameras to show their potential. Any modern phone can take a decent photo given plentiful light. When light is scarce, however, it takes a quality camera to shoot an image worthy of admiration.

Before we comment on any of the images we took last evening, let us take a look at what these four phones have to offer in terms of specs.

Camera Specs

HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusSamsung
Galaxy S7
LG G5
Resolution and
aspect ratio
12MP @ 4:3
4000 x 3000 pixels
12MP @ 4:3
4032 x 3024 pixels
12MP @ 4:3
4032 x 3024 pixels
16MP @ 16:9
5312 x 2988 pixels
Sensor and
pixel size
1/2.3"
1.55 μm
1/3"
1.22 μm
1/2.5"
1.4 μm
1/2.6"
1.12 μm
Focal length
and aperture
26 mm
F1.8
29 mm
F2.2
26mm
F1.7
28 mm
F1.8
Focus and
stabilization
Laser AF
Optical stabilization
Phase detection AF
Optical stabilization
Dual Pixel AF
Optical stabilization
Laser AF
Optical stabilization

Technically, the HTC 10 does not have the most megapixels at its disposal, but this isn't something you should care about anyway. What matters more is that it has the biggest sensor with the biggest pixels. In theory, this should translate to less digital noise and better light sensitivity. The Galaxy S7 stands out with the widest aperture among these four phones, and that is another factor affecting how much light a camera can pick up. Furthermore, we see that all four cameras take advantage of optical image stabilization, allowing them to shoot using longer exposure times, thus absorbing more light. All in all, the HTC does not bring a knife to a gun fight, but its opponents can surely stand their grounds. Let us now see how these four perform in real life.

Recommended Stories
Note: the high-resolution images in the galleries below are smaller than the originals. We've scaled these down to make them load faster. If you insist on seeing the full-resolution photos and don't mind some of them being over 10MB in size, they're in a separate gallery found at the very end of the article.

Scene 1: The museum



By the time we arrived downtown, the sun had already set. Street lamps were about to go off as the little remaining sunlight scattered across the sky was weakening by the minute. The moment seemed right to start shooting.

Disappointingly, the HTC 10 couldn't quite handle this first scene well. Its photo lacks exposure, which gives it a gloomy, unnatural look. Besides, the colors are far from accurate, as evident by the purplish hue dominating the sky. The iPhone 6s Plus yielded a photo with better colors, but it could still use some more exposure. The Galaxy S7 got the colors right and exposed the scene enough to accentuate on the museum's façade, but left the shadows overly dark. It looks like the best image overall was produced by the LG G5, which may have overexposed the sky, but has made everything else in the photo appear close to the way it did in real life.

Scene 1: EXIF data

HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO250ISO100ISO200ISO400
Shutter speed1/251/81/191/12



Scene 2: Silhouettes



It was getting dark quickly, and the streets were starting to look bare. Lights of all kinds were already blending with the twilight when we snapped this set of shots. 

This particular scene was no challenge to the HTC 10, obviously, as it managed to capture a splendid image. Just look at the detail! Sure, the image is a bit grainy from up close due to the higher ISO setting, but we'd take some digital noise over smudged details any day. The iPhone's photo is also looking great. Detail in it isn't quite as sharp, but the image has an overall pleasing, natural look. It is only the Galaxy S7 that managed to mess up the colors by adding too much saturation and not hitting the right white balance. At least details look okay despite the rather aggressive sharpening. As for the LG G5, it is treating us to a very faithful reproduction of the scene – one rich detail and accurate in colors.

Scene 2: EXIF data

HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO640ISO100ISO200ISO400
Shutter speed1/141/41/101/11



Scene 3: At the bar



It was a long day at the office, so we stopped at a favorite place of ours to chill out, and while doing that, we shot this set of images. Analyzing the HTC 10's photo confirms a pattern that we noticed – its camera is not afraid to shoot at high sensitivity levels. This explains the graininess seen in its image. But the good news is that the noise is tolerable – text on the labels, for instance, is still legible – and the high ISO value allows the HTC 10 to keep its shutter speed high, thus reducing the chance of motion blur spoiling the image. And overall, its image looks presentable. It is not the best in this set, but it looks decent nonetheless.

The iPhone 6s Plus took a slightly darker, duller image, but we'd still rank it above average in quality. There's a good amount of detail preserved in it, if you take a closer look. But the photo from the Galaxy S7 definitely draws more attention. The phone drew in more light to produce a brighter, more vivid image. Same is the case with the LG G5, which captured fine details even better than the S7.

Scene 3: EXIF data

HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO3200ISO250ISO1000N/A
Shutter speed1/101/41/101/9




Scene 4: Group shot



As we were about to leave, our lovely bartenders agreed to join us for a group shot. Little did they know that they were going to appear in an article of ours. But that's not important right now. What matters is that all four phones come with powerful LED lights and they know when to use them. 

It is good to see that the HTC 10 managed to take a balanced, well-illuminated photo with pleasing colors. On the downside, the high ISO setting is probably why some of the detail isn't there. The image from the iPhone is slightly darker in appearance, especially in the background, but is still good-looking given the conditions. We like the warm tone in the photo from the Galaxy S7, but we're not into its excessive contrast. And then there's the LG G5, which is once again leading the pack with a bright, detailed image.

Scene 4: EXIF data
HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO1600ISO250ISO200ISO350
Shutter speed1/151/171/151/9



Scene 5: The church




It was getting late, but we still had work to do, so we continued taking photos as we were slowly walking home. This particular scene we're very pleased with because all four smartphones captured it beautifully. Detail in all images is plentiful, colors are accurate, and the exposure is set well. Only the Galaxy S7 shows its tendency to boost colors and saturation, but we'll let it slip this time because it hasn't quite overdone it. We're also going to give the HTC 10 and the LG G5 a slightly higher score for capturing more detail in the shadows.

Scene 5: EXIF data
HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO500ISO160ISO200ISO350
Shutter speed1/171/81/131/10



Scene 6: At the garden




As we said before, the HTC 10 has a tendency to set its sensitivity high, and the result is an increase in digital noise. This is most evident in the scene here, where the ISO value it set has obliterated fine details. Yes, the image looks decent as a whole, but the loss in detail is easily noticeable. The iPhone 6s Plus and Galaxy S7 both got closer to reality with their photos. We see a good amount of details and overall adequate exposure. But we can't deny that the LG G5 deserves the top spot in this round. Its image is full of fine detail – the kind other phones would have failed to capture – and the colors come very close to the way they looked when we shot the image. We're impressed!

Scene 6: EXIF data
HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO3200ISO400ISO1600N/A
Shutter speed1/61/41/101/9




Scene 7: The university



Results are a bit more consistent in this scene, which is expected, as light is plentiful. Aside from some slight color deviations, we're very pleased with the results as a whole. All four images contain a lot of detail, as seen if you take a close look at the façade's decorations. Overall, we're most satisfied with the LG G5 and HTC 10's photos. Both phones have captured the scene in a very natural way. The Galaxy S7 would have pleased us more if it didn't add so much sharpness to its image.

Scene 7: EXIF data

HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO400ISO100ISO200ISO400
Shutter speed1/201/81/181/20



Scene 8: Under the tree



For this last set of photos, the only significant light source nearby was a street light behind us. This, apparently, wasn't enough for any of the four phones to take a compelling photo. All of the images are rather soft in detail, which is to be expected looking at the high ISO values they've used. Overall, the Galaxy S7's image is the one we find best. It looks like its camera has captured the most light, and the photo has a good amount of detail in it. The other three photos look decent overall, but nothing more.

Scene 8: EXIF data

HTC 10iPhone 6s PlusGalaxy S7LG G5
ISOISO3200ISO1250ISO1250N/A
Shutter speed1/61/41/61/9



Conclusion


Now is the time to sum the scores and to announce the winning smartphone, but before we get to that, we want to congratulate HTC on stepping up its game. At long last, we have an HTC flagship with a camera that's in the same league with its high-end rivals. True, the HTC 10 did not win today's comparison, but it gave its opponents a good run for their money. Great job, HTC!

We're no less excited to say that the LG G5 dominated this camera comparison. Scene after scene, it kept on delivering clear, detailed shots without us having to do anything more than pressing the shutter. No less importantly, it is impressive to see it producing constant results – almost every night shot that we took with it turned out really, really good. 

The Galaxy S7 holds great potential with its camera, and we can't deny that we're pleased with the images it takes. Room for improvement is present, however, as the camera software has the tendency to exaggerate certain aspects of the photo, such as contrast and color saturation. Still, when it comes to low-light photography, the camera on the S7 is one of the best performers you'll come across.

As for the iPhone 6s Plus, it may have finished in last place, but the score gap between it and its rivals is slim. It is almost negligible, we'd say. As usual, the iPhone excels in speed and ease of use, which makes it an excellent choice for photographers of any level of expertise. 


Note: Below are the full-resolution photos we took for this comparison. The high-res samples in the previous galleries were smaller in size to load faster.




Create a free account and join our vibrant community
Register to enjoy the full PhoneArena experience. Here’s what you get with your PhoneArena account:
  • Access members-only articles
  • Join community discussions
  • Share your own device reviews
  • Build your personal phone library
Register For Free

Recommended Stories

Loading Comments...
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless