After trying to mob up against Facebook, Apple, Google and the like, the carriers are obviously exploring additional possibilities too, in case those companies give them the boot on additional traffic charges for frequenting sites like YouTube. The carriers' claim is that those sites didn't exist when they planned for their network capacity, and now they need a piece of the action. Valid argument, provided that we weren't already paying them a steep monthly fee for the wireless Internet access anyway.
It is precisely this fee that the carriers are contemplating to slice and dice now, according to the type of usage. A recent presentation by two big companies that provide subscriber management services to large carriers like Verizon, AT&T and Vodafone, reveals a nice little traffic segmentation plan. Openet and Allot Communications are advertising tools to help carriers charge depending on the kind of Internet traffic their customers are generating. Here's the scoop:
"[We use] a number of different methods to accurately identify the application -- methods like heuristic analysis, behavioral and historical analysis, deep packet inspection, and a number of other techniques. What's key is that we have the best application identification available on the market, which means that even applications that are encrypted or use other methods to evade detection will be correctly identified and classified... We essentially feed this real-time information about traffic and application usage into the policy and charging system. Each subscriber has a particular service plan that they sign up for, and they're as generic or as personalized as the operator wants."
All of that might mean that if you are just updating your Facebook status or chatting on Skype every now and then, you will be charged differently than if, say, you throw the daily top ten YouTube videos in the mix. On top of that, if you use a VPN, or some other encrypted service, the two companies still say they can identify what are you visiting with which applications, and help carriers charge accordingly. It might be a steep climb, if that's what the carriers have in mind, since we can imagine all sorts of privacy concerns arising.
Daniel, a devoted tech writer at PhoneArena since 2010, has been engrossed in mobile technology since the Windows Mobile era. His expertise spans mobile hardware, software, and carrier networks, and he's keenly interested in the future of digital health, car connectivity, and 5G. Beyond his professional pursuits, Daniel finds balance in travel, reading, and exploring new tech innovations, while contemplating the ethical and privacy implications of our digital future.
Recommended Stories
Loading Comments...
COMMENT
All comments need to comply with our
Community Guidelines
Phonearena comments rules
A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
Things that are NOT allowed: