Late Friday, Samsung and Apple filed a 361 page document with the district court that will be hearing their patent trial. The trial is scheduled to begin July 30th with voire dire (which literally means 'to speak the truth' and is used as a way for the court to select the jury). In the document, both Samsung and Apple raised objections to the jury instructions that each side requests be read prior to deliberations. Each side has certain instructions that they want read to the jury at specific times. Most objections are based on the exact words that the judge will read to the jury, although Samsung has some complaints based on race.
"Languages other than English may be used during this trial. One such language will be Korean. The evidence to be considered by you is only that provided through the official court translators. Although some of you may know Korean, it is important that all jurors consider the same evidence. Therefore, you must accept the English translation. You must disregard any different meaning."-One of Apple's proposed jury instructions
Apple wants a disclaimer read when the first foreign witness testifies, that says that other languages like Korean will be spoken at the trial and that even if a juror knows Korean or any other language used, only the official English translation should be considered. Samsung, which is based in South Korea, says that this statement will only point out the ethnicity or a witness. Samsung's own instruction is similar to Apple's, but removes the use of "Korean" in the opening sentence.
Judge Lucy Koh
Another point that both sides disagree on is the definition of certain patents. Samsung says a "'design patent’ protects the way an article looks, but not the way it functions.” On the other hand, Apple disputes this definition and says that the "instruction is misleading because design patents protect articles of manufacture that have or serve a function, so long as the overall design of the article is not 'dictated by function'."
It is up to Judge Lucy Koh to make a decision about the jury instructions. She could ask both sides to narrow down their requests or she could wait for the pretrial conference. Both sides might have to make their objections and changes on the fly as the trial proceeds. Whatever the judge decides this is just another indication of the wide gulf between Samsung and Apple. You can check out the filing of the disputed jury instructions below.
Alan, an ardent smartphone enthusiast and a veteran writer at PhoneArena since 2009, has witnessed and chronicled the transformative years of mobile technology. Owning iconic phones from the original iPhone to the iPhone 15 Pro Max, he has seen smartphones evolve into a global phenomenon. Beyond smartphones, Alan has covered the emergence of tablets, smartwatches, and smart speakers.
Recommended Stories
Loading Comments...
COMMENT
All comments need to comply with our
Community Guidelines
Phonearena comments rules
A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
Things that are NOT allowed: