Debate: What’s more important: a bigger battery or wireless charging?

So Fiesty. 😆 🤣 😂

😂 I'm just saying. I know how you get. 😂

But you're right. The cable definitely makes a difference. I learned that back in the Nextel days before the iPhone came out. People were buying $10 gas station chargers & frying the motherboard on $500 phones. I'm good with a $30 charger/cable from the OEM.

They are, but you can damage the port by using cheap cables.

Companies like Belkin and Damsi g, when you use their Type-C cable, it goes in and out with ease.

Cheap cables sometimes fit tighter and are actually stretch the housing around the port. So then your cable of high quality fits loose.

I tried using cheap USB cables on my desktop. It fit so tight, when I pulled it out, it pulled the metal clip out that is in the USB-A.

Wireless charging is great when you need it. But Apple's way where you have to use another plug to make the connection is so such for "old people". While teens are saying Android is for old people. 😆

So many falsehoods with your characterization of iPhones and battery life and RAM and multitasking. I'm just gonna let it go. But if you think iOS isn't more optimized than Android your living in a fantasy world. And I use a Google Pixel.

You don't get both. You get the same battery life as everyone at the top-end.

But keeping stanning Samsung. I'm glad your happy. Clueless on the tech side but happy nonetheless.

There is nothing that can replace a good battery endurance. Not even the super duper fast charging because that means your smartphone depends on something fixed. If my phone take 90 minutes to charge it's perfectly fine, as long as it lasts 2 days on a charge.

No iOS is NOT more optimized vs Android. It is impossible.

I will show you the difference. Android has far more services running in the background. Then you have server-side apps, and power the hardware inside also.

Because Android phones have more background tasks running, more hardware to power and needs to rum all your multitasking features and apps and it's all happening at the same time, means Andeoid has to be more optimized to juggle more tasks with similar clock speeds as another mobile device.

You are completely ignorant to those facts. That's why you gonna let it go because you csnt win. As powerful as the new Mac SoC is, ot is doing fares tasks than most Windowd machines that costs half the price. It's lole putting a Ferrari engine in a pinto. Fast e gone POS car.

You fanboys just don't even understand computing.

Optimizing a platform means bring able to confine the tasks to a point the tasks don't overwhelm the limits of your power source.

In this case, mobile ARM have a power and heat ceiling they cant pass. This won't matter on a desktop or laptop. Because they have active cooling.

The iPhone is not multitasking lole Android. You must be sleep walking. The iPhone hols zero running apps in ram, other than system background tasks. If you open a browser and put in an address and press go and immediate leave the browser, it will stop loading the page until you come back to it. On Android it keeps loading in the background like my PC does. The iPhone freezes practically all apps unrelated to the iOS software and apps own apps.

This is a proven documented facts. On my phone I can open 25 apps back to back and they will all run in the background amd continue loading. The only apps that I but e freeze are big games that take up lits of ram. But since my phone has plenty of it, thos is rarely an issue.

You guys love to throw around big words. You don't even know what the meaning if it is.

It is mathematically impossible for iOS to be more optimized than Android. The optimization works different.

As I stated, Android is a VM. I'm a VM apps are sandbox from the hardware. This is why on Android you tech icLly could run yhe latest version of Android on an older phone, but the software would simply overwhelm the specs. It would just be really slow. Like trying to run a new version of Windows on an old set of hardware.

Optimization of an OS is adjusting apps and services to use as little power as possible and yet have them be fast. It means bring app to run a certain about of apps in a clock cycle. Per clock cycle Android phones are doing more vs iOS devices.

Having all those apps, hardware and stuff running and yet my Android last as long or sometimes longer than your iPhone and yet I can do way more stuff means my device is more optimized than your.

If you don't understand that simple fact, then you are a lose cause and nothing I saw will help you. You just domt understand facts.

You need to go on YouTube and watch this video by Gary Explains.

https://youtu.be/D9prht-PcWY?si=W8OT-6LShi8ADsAL

Optimization os based on tasks performed per clock cycle.

AMD chips are better optimized vs Intel chips because they so more tasks per clock cycle. This also make them technically faster. But Windows was designed around the Intel processor, so in general Windows in most cases will still run better.

Android would be too heavy for iPhone because the hardware specs are to shallow.

You woulf have to reoptimize Android to have less background running tasks because the iPhone hardware wouldn't be able to push the same capability because iOS was design to limit stuff.

Bigger battery, no brainer...

Wireless charging is still very gimmicky to me, although I would not mind trying it out if it comes to less expensive phones. But for now, even though i dont need a humungous battery yet, bigger battery capacity is more important than wireless charging...

I would have to say bigger battery. Wireless charging is nice to have, but having more battery is almost essential