A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
A wireless charging coil is less than 1mm in thickness. That is a separate issue, but they have been promoting thin phones as the gospel for a long time. Manufacturers could make the phone thicker with a bigger battery and still include wireless charging. Do not make us choose, this is a silly argument.
With no disrespect meant, your question and the artical surrounding it is nonsensical. What truly would be gained by eliminating wireless charging? Maybe 30 min to an hour of run time (based on someone who burns through a 5000 ma battery in one day). The gain is negligible in the real world. Whether you like wireless charging or not, I just don't see the tradeoff. I have an S23U on which i have battery saver enabled (only charges to 85% max) and I get around 3 days to get to 25% before I recharge (wirelessly by the way). I have both a wireless fast charger and a 45 watt wired charger at my dedicated charging station (they are aways connected). I find no difference in effort to lug my phone into wireless than the wired connection. I always use my wireless for the phone because I usually use my wired charger for my Tab S8+(which takes much much longer to charge wirelessly) and they usually get charged at the same time (over night). So my ultimate humble opinion is keep the wireless charging as the gain in battery size by eliminating this feature would be negligible.
Wireless charging is not truly wireless, though :) You still deal with cables. A truly wireless charging system would be a photovoltaic solar cell on your phone, leaving it in the sun. I'm splitting hairs here and joking. I think new types of batteries would solve all the issues we have right now—solid state, graphene, or something else. Imagine 10 000mAh in the same size as modern Li-Ion batteries and charging in one minute; it's absolutely possible and has been done in labs, still away from mass production, though.
It's a conceptual debate; I get your points, but we see how Apple and Samsung boast half an hour or an hour of battery improvement as a huge thing between generations. I spoke with Asus back in the ZenFone 8-9 days, and they were pretty keen that removing the wireless charging system (or omitting it) saved 400–500 mAh of battery capacity.
On the other hand, the Zenfone 10 has wireless charging onboard and retains the same size and almost the same weight as the 9, so sometimes it's just snake oil, smoke, and mirrors. I've always been curious about wireless charging; it's just so slow that the only real application for me would be placing the phone on the charging mat when I go to sleep, but then again, why not plug the cable in instead?
My case of using wireless charging is due to the fragile nature of the charging port. Unless you are very careful to line up the cable you risk ... over time... of wearing out the charging port, and if it's soldered to the board then you will pay out the nose for a repair! I also use wired headphones and since it's hard to find a decent phone with a headphone jack this also ads to the wear-and-tear on the port. So even though I can easily go two days on one charge I like wireless.... but I lived without it for years and could do so again.
In either case I could also live with a fatter phone and a larger battery!
My case of using wireless charging is due to the fragile nature of the charging port. Unless you are very careful to line up the cable you risk ... over time... of wearing out the charging port, and if it's soldered to the board then you will pay out the nose for a repair! I also use wired headphones and since it's hard to find a decent phone with a headphone jack this also ads to the wear-and-tear on the port. So even though I can easily go two days on one charge I like wireless.... but I lived without it for years and could do so again.
In either case I could also live with a fatter phone and a larger battery!
Things that are NOT allowed:
A wireless charging coil is less than 1mm in thickness. That is a separate issue, but they have been promoting thin phones as the gospel for a long time. Manufacturers could make the phone thicker with a bigger battery and still include wireless charging. Do not make us choose, this is a silly argument.
Battery life is more important than power replenishment method. Besides it's difficult to use your phone while it's on a wireless charger.
With no disrespect meant, your question and the artical surrounding it is nonsensical. What truly would be gained by eliminating wireless charging? Maybe 30 min to an hour of run time (based on someone who burns through a 5000 ma battery in one day). The gain is negligible in the real world. Whether you like wireless charging or not, I just don't see the tradeoff. I have an S23U on which i have battery saver enabled (only charges to 85% max) and I get around 3 days to get to 25% before I recharge (wirelessly by the way). I have both a wireless fast charger and a 45 watt wired charger at my dedicated charging station (they are aways connected). I find no difference in effort to lug my phone into wireless than the wired connection. I always use my wireless for the phone because I usually use my wired charger for my Tab S8+(which takes much much longer to charge wirelessly) and they usually get charged at the same time (over night). So my ultimate humble opinion is keep the wireless charging as the gain in battery size by eliminating this feature would be negligible.
Wireless charging is not truly wireless, though :) You still deal with cables. A truly wireless charging system would be a photovoltaic solar cell on your phone, leaving it in the sun. I'm splitting hairs here and joking. I think new types of batteries would solve all the issues we have right now—solid state, graphene, or something else. Imagine 10 000mAh in the same size as modern Li-Ion batteries and charging in one minute; it's absolutely possible and has been done in labs, still away from mass production, though.
It's a conceptual debate; I get your points, but we see how Apple and Samsung boast half an hour or an hour of battery improvement as a huge thing between generations. I spoke with Asus back in the ZenFone 8-9 days, and they were pretty keen that removing the wireless charging system (or omitting it) saved 400–500 mAh of battery capacity.
On the other hand, the Zenfone 10 has wireless charging onboard and retains the same size and almost the same weight as the 9, so sometimes it's just snake oil, smoke, and mirrors. I've always been curious about wireless charging; it's just so slow that the only real application for me would be placing the phone on the charging mat when I go to sleep, but then again, why not plug the cable in instead?
All high end Smartphone need 6-7000mAh, Migh end 5000mAh And low end 4500mAh..
My case of using wireless charging is due to the fragile nature of the charging port. Unless you are very careful to line up the cable you risk ... over time... of wearing out the charging port, and if it's soldered to the board then you will pay out the nose for a repair! I also use wired headphones and since it's hard to find a decent phone with a headphone jack this also ads to the wear-and-tear on the port. So even though I can easily go two days on one charge I like wireless.... but I lived without it for years and could do so again.
In either case I could also live with a fatter phone and a larger battery!
My case of using wireless charging is due to the fragile nature of the charging port. Unless you are very careful to line up the cable you risk ... over time... of wearing out the charging port, and if it's soldered to the board then you will pay out the nose for a repair! I also use wired headphones and since it's hard to find a decent phone with a headphone jack this also ads to the wear-and-tear on the port. So even though I can easily go two days on one charge I like wireless.... but I lived without it for years and could do so again.
In either case I could also live with a fatter phone and a larger battery!